Some of you know that I attended a conference in Minnesota this week sponsored by the National Cooperative Grocer's Association, NCGA. Last year I spent time with the "TeaEO" of Honest Tea, Seth Goldman, and he spoke about the issues of market innovation, consumer education, and reaching the masses with an amazing product. Honest Tea was the first organic bottled tea to hit the market back in 1998, providing a healthy, non carbonated, low sugar alternative to the beverage world, something that was missing. Seth returned this year as a keynote speaker to address us all as a collective with the same presentation to better educate us surrounding these challenges - and to address one very big white elephant in the room.
Honest Tea. Delicious, organic fair trade tea. |
I believe this falls, for a lot of people, under the idea of epistemiclosure, or the idea of only regarding facts around an idea or piece of knowledge that fits one's personal frame of reference (think Fox News watching, Christian-Republican, gun toting America as a stereotypical example - or tree hugging, granola eating, God-hating Liberal hippies as another.) Honest Tea is a company that has endured criticism, consumer fury and been shunned by many in the natural foods community for becoming part of this larger argument. BUT, consider this: they are a wholly owned subsidiary of the Coca Cola Company, meaning that Honest Tea is still in control of the majority of their company through stocks and Seth's management (only 40% of stock is owned by Coke - Seth himself owns the controlling stake of 51%.) So what they are NOT is a division under the large umbrella of Coke's ownership, meaning Coke is 100% in charge. Subsidiary vs. Division: this is important, people. Yes, Coke distributes their product, so naturally it leaves a slightly bitter taste in the mouth for some - but, where does that leave them as a company? From my standpoint, I see that Coca Cola is making an investment: by letting this successful smaller company specializing in organic and fair trade spearhead this social movement (with their brand name behind it, yes) that it sure does make Coke look a little less "evil", doesn't it? Obviously it matters on some level over the money, as Honest Tea does not rake in nearly the number of dollars Coke does - Coke is throwing their name behind Honest Tea for more fundamental reasons than most give them.
Tea(C)EO Seth Goldman speaking at a National Beverage Conference. |
Why is this important to understand? Because it is clear that without proper saturation in the market, without exposure to customers that do not buy organic or fair trade, and without growth and support, a company cannot grow fast enough to keep up with the demand of 8+ billion people. Honest Tea has succeeded in doing this, all with a simple risk of becoming a part of a larger corporate umbrella. Personally, I agree with the decision they made in 2007, with this short essay as my reasoning. I am personally committed to this idea and I firmly believe in what I do, and I love doing it. I have the best job in the world: providing the people and families of my community with good health and education to better their lives and the lives around them, in a nut shell. I don't just sell food, I give knowledge. I give support. I give provisions for personal and social change.
So, in closing, would you support the cause of a company that believes in bettering the world through better health and consumer practices? Or would you turn up your nose to ignore the change made not only at the world consumer level but also at the world corporate level, just because of who's money is behind it?
I like tea. And recycling. And progressive change. So should you.
Extra info in the links below:
NCGA https://www.ncga.coop/
Just Label It! Campaign http://justlabelit.org/
Honest Tea http://www.honesttea.com/
Organic Certification http://www.organic.org/
Fair Trade Certification http://www.fairtradeusa.org/